Chapter 15: The Fine Print — Broadcasts, Contracts, and Leverage
The deal was agreed in principle.
The headlines—internally, at least—were done.
Now came the real work.
The first few weeks after the August 2025 announcement weren’t about vision.
They were about detail.
Contracts.
Obligations.
Clauses.
Matthew Manson, alongside John Martin and the wider Pershing team, shifted focus immediately:
Understand exactly what they had bought.
Opening the Books
Inside Professional Fighters League, the structure became clearer with every passing day.Fighter contracts—layered but manageable.
Operational costs—predictable.
And then—
The key piece.
Broadcast.
The existing U.S. deal with ESPN.
“That’s the lever,” Manson said in a Las Vegas review session.
Because timing was everything.
The deal was set to run through late 2026.
Which meant one thing:
Flexibility.
Not immediate.
But approaching.
The Strategic Question
Do you wait?Or do you start shaping what comes next?
Manson didn’t hesitate.
“We start now.”
The ESPN Meetings
The early conversations with ESPN were careful.This wasn’t a renegotiation.
Not yet.
It was positioning.
Understanding appetite.
Testing reaction.
And, most importantly—
Introducing the idea.
Not PFL.
But what came next.
Bellator MMA.
Martin led much of the discussion.
Measured. Direct. Commercially focused.
“We’re looking at evolving the product,” he said in one meeting.
A pause.
“Significantly.”
The Rebrand Leverage
The pitch wasn’t complicated.If the rebrand landed in early 2026—
It wouldn’t feel like a continuation.
It would feel like a launch.
A new organisation.
A new structure.
A new identity.
“That creates noise,” Manson said afterwards.
The right kind of noise.
Because in broadcast—
Attention equals leverage.
“If we get this right,” Martin added, “we’re not renegotiating a deal…”
A beat.
“We’re selling a new product.”
Keeping Options Open
But Pershing wasn’t naive.Amazon remained the frontrunner.
The existing conversations.
The broader ecosystem play.
The alignment with boxing and NWPW.
It all pointed there.
But this wasn’t about rushing into exclusivity.
Ackman had been clear.
“Test the market.”
Which meant:
- Continue discussions with ESPN
- Keep dialogue open with Amazon
- Understand valuation from multiple angles
The stronger their position.
Fixing the Product
Broadcast wasn’t just about who showed the fights.It was about what they were showing.
And this was where one of the biggest issues emerged.
Event structure.
Specifically—
Naming.
Scheduling.
Clarity.
“The current format is too complicated,” McMahon said in one session.
He wasn’t wrong.
Season-based branding.
Playoff structures.
Event titles that lacked identity.
For a casual audience—
It was confusing.
For a broadcaster—
It was limiting.
The New Approach
Manson laid out the shift.“We simplify everything.”
No seasons.
No playoffs.
Instead:
- Numbered events or clearly branded fight nights
- Consistent naming conventions
- Defined locations
Not part of a system fans needed to decode.
But part of a product they could immediately understand.
Location Strategy
The same applied to venues.Instead of scattered, loosely connected scheduling—
The plan was tighter.
More deliberate.
Key markets.
Repeat locations.
Stronger local identity.
“Build familiarity,” Manson said.
Because familiarity built habit.
And habit built audiences.
ESPN’s Perspective
The feedback from ESPN was measured—but positive.They understood the issues.
They saw the potential in simplification.
And most importantly—
They recognised the value of a rebrand done properly.
“It gives us something to market,” one executive noted.
That mattered.
Because broadcasters didn’t just want content.
They wanted stories.
And a full reset—
Was a story.
The Internal View
Back in Las Vegas, the conclusion was clear.They weren’t locked into a single path.
They had:
- A live deal through 2026
- A rebrand coming in 2026
- Multiple interested platforms
Leverage.
Real leverage.
Final Thought
As the team wrapped another late session, Manson summed it up simply:“We’ve got a window.”
A pause.
“Now we decide how to use it.”
Because between late 2025 and the end of 2026—
Everything was in play.
The product.
The platform.
The future.
And for Pershing—
That wasn’t uncertainty.
It was opportunity.
Last edited:
