- Joined
- Mar 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,893
- Reaction score
- 1,241
- Points
- 0
- Location
- United Scotland of Ambrose
Hollywood Dolph'sZiggler said:Are we really questioning a college students' ability to use the word 'too'?
Come on dumbasses, get real. He pretty clearly was referring to the first to and somehow not seeing the second. It's well documented that Crayo and MVP like to argue about pointless shit, so just add this to the list.
As for the grammar debate, there is no need. Any time this happens in the future just refer to myself or GN, AKA the Grammar power couple of this board
The three quotes below were posted before though and he just happened to miss them.
Crayo said:That's excessive examples of "too". Him saying "I am to awesome" comes under that, so it should definitely be "I am too awesome", he is excessively awesome right?
You're welcome. :sandow:
Stopspot said:No I proved you incorrect. You are mixing them up. The sentence that Crayo corrected Farooq on was "I am to awesome for that". Crayo corrected it to "I am too awesome for that" which is its correct form.
Stopspot said:But the term to awesome, which was Farooq's original phrasing would implying that he is going to be awesome. Whilst hjs desired effect was that he is more awesome than subject X. That would imply him being too much awesome. You are only proving the flaws in the American educational system.
Still, will give him the benefit of the doubt, just think it's funny that he missed all of them all.