American vs British grammar systems.

[Hannah Bee]

Hannah is famous lmfao

Word is unreliable sometimes.

 

[Arrow1]

RE: Hannah is famous lmfao

and you are again making a mistake. To means that something will happen aka the leader being angry. Too means that there is too much of something, Crayo has too much stuff in his closet, Stopspot has too many shoes, Hoss has too many books for his book shelf et cetera.

You keep proving me correct. How does the sentence I just screen shot, apply to having too much of something? It's in the same format of saying that...

"The leader is going to be mad"
"We are going to the beach"
"There's not much to do today"

I do believe I have just owned you both. :sandow:

 

[Crayo]

Hannah is famous lmfao

Where have you owned me MVP? Curiosity is prevailing.

 

[Stopspot]

Hannah is famous lmfao

But the term to awesome, which was Farooq's original phrasing would implying that he is going to be awesome. Whilst hjs desired effect was that he is more awesome than subject X. That would imply him being too much awesome. You are only proving the flaws in the American educational system.

 

[Big Hoss Rambler]

Hannah is famous lmfao

looks like Randy and MVP have the same grammar.

 

[Crayo]

Hannah is famous lmfao

MVP you have already admitted you were wrong about Farooq's post lmao. He posted it in excessive context resulting in it being "too". Learn2too.

 

[Hannah Bee]

Hannah is famous lmfao

Someone change the title of this thread "American English vs. British English Grammar Thread" please.

Imma report you all as off-topic. XDD

 

[Arrow1]

RE: Hannah is famous lmfao

But the term to awesome, which was Farooq's original phrasing would implying that he is going to be awesome. Whilst hjs desired effect was that he is more awesome than subject X. That would imply him being too much awesome. You are only proving the flaws in the American educational system.

I'm proving the flaws in the British educational system. Even Microsoft Word proves me right.. That's my proof. Not to mention, I have a lot of background in the English field through my school.

 

[Arrow1]

RE: Hannah is famous lmfao

MVP you have already admitted you were wrong about Farooq's post lmao. He posted it in excessive context resulting in it being "too". Learn2too.

Dude, I proved you wrong with the best text editing software on this earth.

 

[Crayo]

RE: Hannah is famous lmfao

I'm proving the flaws in the British educational system. Even Microsoft Word proves me right.. That's my proof.

Self-own. Actually study grammar from legitimate sources and don't rely on red squiggly lines on Microsoft Word.

Not to mention, I have a lot of background in the English field through my school.

Was your background misspelling "too" constantly? I don't even think my correction is incorrect in American vocabulary, but I don't trust my knowledge on their grammatical rules as much as I do with the English version.

Edit: All you have proven to me is that Word corrects you on a completely different context. You didn't use an excessive-implying sentence which makes your "correction" absolutely void. Jesus.

 

[Arrow1]

@[GrammarNazi82] Please tell Crayo and Stopspot that I am right.

 

[Big Hoss Rambler]

mvp is muy estupido when it comes to grammar.

 

[Crayo]

Oh my fucking god :facepalm:

Done with this, I've corrected you too many times to not worry about suicide.

 

[Hannah Bee]

I'm a fucking draw.

 

[Arrow1]

RE: Hannah is famous lmfao

Self-own. Actually study grammar from legitimate sources and don't rely on red squiggly lines on Microsoft Word.


Was your background misspelling "too" constantly? I don't even think my correction is incorrect in American vocabulary, but I don't trust my knowledge on their grammatical rules as much as I do with the English version.

Edit: All you have proven to me is that Word corrects you on a completely different context. You didn't use an excessive-implying sentence which makes your "correction" absolutely void. Jesus.

I simply quoted Farooq's original sentence, which you stated was incorrect. So, I proved you wrong. L2Admit.