I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Lol at the "piracy" comments. WWE is so popular it would probably top steam sales for a few weeks and turn in quite the profit. Thing is, the game would have not to be dogshit for that to happen. Seriously, only Indie developers and shitty games have to worry this much about cracked content. The...
If we are to take Russo's words to heart, it was just the guy handling her account that said that. She's going to give a 90 minutes interview to russo regarding her situation.
They mention the boss-beating alcohol worshipper Steve Austin. Also yay for talking of demons and spooky shit with kane and company. I concede the point that they do control a lot of what comes from the attitude era, but the shit I just mentioned is equally dangerous if you take the conservative...
Isn't that triple h's point, though? That making her known again is bad? Isn't that the same as saying it's better to let her fade away to protect the kids?
Sure, it's not a chris benoit thing, but he blatantly said it was better to let her mix with the crowd. Also, praise the lord if this...
As far as "cleaning up" goes, Chyna is not a porn star anymore, does that make the analogy go full-circle?
I personally think that x-pac is a hell of a worse role model then chyna, and this is also verifiable through a click. Also, it's not like you type her in and "OMFG CLICK HERE FOR BIGGER...
She's not anymore. I do get your point, but "Ohh, think of the children" seems like a bad excuse, considering how many drug addicts and troublemakers got into the hall of fame.
Fair enough. I do agree with above posts saying this was just a philly thing, though. Reigns was well-received on raw and smackdown, assuming the latter had little to no edition.
on-topic: That's the first time I hear ryback saying something that isn't smart or very sportsmanlike. The regret...
I actually think Ambrose vs Brock would be awesome. Seeing ambrose getting absolutely punished and actually fighting back and giving brock hell(not necessarily winning the match) would be gold.
Ziggler would be also nice, seeing as he has better selling skills then the myth-busters's ragdoll...
It was just not a safe bet. Making someone be defined as the streak-breaker and hope fans will buy it is risky. Undertaker was just too simbolic and nostalgic. Brock isn't, Brock's just a guy who happens to have a shitload of titles, who was aways a monster in his carreer and then further...
I think it would be nicer to just have someone outside the rumble screw bryan(sheamus?) just so he doesn't look like a noob for getting thrown out so early
Thank god. I can actually imagine vince doing something like "hey, bubba, you know, we want you, but the fans won't understand you being so different, so you have a few months to get chubby again and we'll have you with open arms! XOXO"
At the time it seemed stupid, in hindsight it was brilliant.
WWE could never make a monster quite like brock lesnar without the streak. He was an extremely beliavable person to actually break the streak, but no one really did give it thought because of how smarky even the casual fans can be...