Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Pratchett

    Do you think WWE will sign AJ Styles?

    This is also assuming he would want to sign with the E. If he is really upset with TNA, it is a bigger slap in the face to them if he wrestles in the indies from now on anyway.
  2. Pratchett

    Jerry Lawler at his best

    If there was a marking out smiley on this forum, I would post it here.
  3. Pratchett

    BAH! HUMBUG!

    I despise the Salvation Army bell ringers. Not personally, but for the organization they represent. My wife used to work for them, and she ended up having a lot of money from her paychecks not show up. When we tried to get answers, we were told the records were lost. Right.
  4. Pratchett

    The team of Rybaxel

    There is still a chance Ryback can make something of himself in the WWE. Axel is done. Regardless of his in ring ability, his lack of charisma and the FACT that he was saddled with the piss poor worst name in the history of pro graps "Michael McGillicutty" means to me that Curtis Axel is dead...
  5. Pratchett

    World Map of Average Titty Size

    I don't recall seeing many Russian women with large breasts. Then again the only Russian women I remember seeing were the ones on the websites where you could get yourself a hot, horny wife looking to live the American Dream. Only out of curiosity, of course.
  6. Pratchett

    Your take on Handicap matches

    The WWE does use them too much. It is a really good tool for a corrupt GM every once in a while, but anymore it happens too often. So it ends up losing the impact that it once had. WWE really should do more focus group research or something. It's like they have fallen completely into the...
  7. Pratchett

    could the undertaker be 'the devil'

    Taker wouldn't have to necessarily tap out, but to me that would make the victory definitive. Especially if there ends up being any interference or controversy. I for one would be happy if the Undertaker never wrestled again. He has always been one of my favorites, and The Streak is one of...
  8. Pratchett

    could the undertaker be 'the devil'

    Here's a thought that recently occurred to me... What if the Devil that Wyatt is referring to is the Undertaker, but the Undertaker doesn't know it? He could end up playing Bryan and Taker off each other, trying to use them both for his own ends. This can help establish him with the fans as a...
  9. Pratchett

    WWE teaches faces not to sell losses

    I'm not buying it. If it is true, then we are heading towards an era that will be blander than PG. On the plus side I could end up saving plenty of money on melatonin. On the minus side this would not facilitate my hopes of one day drinking less alcohol than I currently do. All things...
  10. Pratchett

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    That's not best for business, bro. :pity2:
  11. Pratchett

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    The problem with is though the average 10 yr old has such a short attention span, there just isn't enough time to build up a proper rivalry. :troll:
  12. Pratchett

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    I watch SD mostly out of habit, and often times I will have it on (recorded) while piddling about on the interwebs. The saddest thing to me is that with all these hours of programming, why do they need to have so many replays and recaps? I get to see the same things over and over so many times...
  13. Pratchett

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    You are just beginning to notice this? There have been no separate "brands" for a while now, and if they are going to keep it that way then it makes no sense to have both a WWE Title and WHC belt. For that matter they need to get rid of the US Title belt. The only reason I can see to keep...
  14. Pratchett

    Rookie of the year?

    Since when does it have to make sense who gets it? Ambrose winning it makes for conflict. Which in the end, can be used to push someone like Reigns even farther.
  15. Pratchett

    Rookie of the year?

    That is actually my point. He still has the belt and doesn't really do that much. Which eventually will rub the others the wrong way. If he wins the award by himself, I am sure the others will take issue with that.
  16. Pratchett

    Rookie of the year?

    I hope that Ambrose gets it. He has held the US belt for a long time, well after Reigns and Rollins lost the Tag Team belt. I have come to believe that him carrying that belt and getting more attention than the others may eventually be a catalyst for The Shield breaking up. If he does win...
  17. Pratchett

    Rookie of the year?

    I agree The Shield has had the biggest impact, but like others I have trouble giving a singles award like RoTY to an entire group. Then again for me there were no single wrestlers that actually stood out that much more than the others. I thought Cesaro was going to really break out during his...
  18. Pratchett

    The Walking Dead Discussion Thread(spoilers)

    See Trips? Baby is alive. The world needs hope, and dead babies give hope to no one. Unless that is the kind of thing you are hoping for... ? :notsure:
  19. Pratchett

    Bad News Barrett

    I wonder who he pissed off to get stuck with this gimmick. LOL. The worst part about it is that it may be the best one he's had to work with since he showed up in WWE. Seems pretty appropriate for the most overrated jobber they have on the roster. Maybe he'll finally make something of himself...
  20. Pratchett

    The Walking Dead Discussion Thread(spoilers)

    Not sure, but clearly the buckle on the seat was undone. Zom's can't do that. Plus, if she was eaten, there should have been scraps. If not in the seat, then on the ground next to it. There was nothing but blood, which could be explained by the injuries of whoever rescued her.
Top Bottom