Who headlines?

[Leo C]

The only issue with the triple h scenario is that they literally just did something similar with DB like 2 years ago.

They have been doing the same storyline since 1998. I really think that's something one has to put past him if he's going to watch WWE.

 

[Snowman]

If you want a serious answer... I'd kayfabe fire Roman after he loses at the Rumble. Get Roman Reigns off the road for a while, build up another guy, but still have the Authority screw with people on Raw. Keep their heat. Eventually Ambrose has had enough right after Fast Lane where he's screwed out of the IC and attacks Triple H with kendo sticks and stuff, next week in an attempt to "fire" him Roman runs down the ramp to save his job and Superman Triple while he's talking...

Either way, they really have to get Roman off TV to keep him from being the latest injury to derail their Mania plans.

And I hope "Urrr everyone else is hurt so guess it's us again woo" is the build for Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar IV

 

[edge4ever]

They have been doing the same storyline since 1998. I really think that's something one has to put past him if he's going to watch WWE.

Well I know this but doing it so soon is rediculous. I know they repeat the same formula. But good lord this is old.

 

[edge4ever]

How so?

DB and triple h. Triple h tries to stop the upcoming star by having a match with him. He gets involved and says DB won't be anything until he can get through him. I mean it would be a little different if triple h is champ and defends against reigns. But it's still similar.

The authority in general has been repeating the same garbage for the past few years.

 

[The GOAT]

DB and triple h. Triple h tries to stop the upcoming star by having a match with him. He gets involved and says DB won't be anything until he can get through him. I mean it would be a little different if triple h is champ and defends against reigns. But it's still similar.

The authority in general has been repeating the same garbage for the past few years.

Thought you were referring directly to the Rumble match itself. Still, Reigns defending the strap against Hunter or the other way around is still different enough for me that it isn't a complete copy of the Bryan angle from 2014. That one also had the unique element of us knowing it was a mixture of reality and fiction, since we all knew Bryan really WAS being held down by the machine in real life and it took the fans' support to get him to where he was, whereas with Reigns it's the complete opposite and thus loses a lot of it's magic and feels not much different than the other 1500 Babyface vs Evil Owner storylines that we've seen over the last twenty years.

 

[edge4ever]

Thought you were referring directly to the Rumble match itself. Still, Reigns defending the strap against Hunter or the other way around is still different enough for me that it isn't a complete copy of the Bryan angle from 2014. That one also had the unique element of us knowing it was a mixture of reality and fiction, since we all knew Bryan really WAS being held down by the machine in real life and it took the fans' support to get him to where he was, whereas with Reigns it's the complete opposite and thus loses a lot of it's magic and feels not much different than the other 1500 Babyface vs Evil Owner storylines that we've seen over the last twenty years.

Well yeah, Bryan's will be better for sure, but the storyline in and of itself is the same formula. Hell, I wouldn't mind a reinfs vs triple h match as of right now. I'm sure it would be good. I'm just getting sick of the authority rhetoric.