Vince McMahon Sex Trafficking / Resignation Mega Thread

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crocker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
994
Points
113
Location
Manchester, England
Janel Grant is set to speak at the Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence on Thursday, February 19.

She will be joined by Alex Brown.


From Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence:

The event will feature survivors Janel Grant and Alex Brown sharing their lived experiences, alongside advocates, state leaders and policy makers urging legislative action to strengthen protections for incarcerated survivors and ensure transparency and accountability across systems.

Advocates and survivor are calling for changes to state NDA laws to prevent the use of confidentiality provisions that silence survivors of sexual violence, harassment, discrimination and retaliation. Reforming non-disclosure agreement laws ensures that survivors’ rights to speak about harm are enforceable, consistent, and not dependent on the relative power of an employer or institution. Updating state law transforms confidentiality from a tool of coercion into a survivor-centered choice by closing loopholes that allow retaliation, secrecy, and repeated harm.

We are all more vulnerable to coercive control than we realize. Coercive control happens in increments, and entire industries are built on systems of coercive control. Tools such as NDAs can be used to ominously justify anything, and even turn a life into someone else’s storyline, keeping even those who have not signed confidentiality agreements working in fear. Any system that sacrifices people, whether current or former employees, at the expense of safety and human dignity, is dangerous, if not impossible, for someone to ‘leave.’ I’m not alone in living a life looking over my shoulder. Evolving systems and holistic change in how we address sexual violence remains painfully slow. I am here to be a part of the solution and give a voice to people in Connecticut who are living and working in fear. I want to empower others with information in the hopes that we can create a better and safer world.


Janel Grant, a former WWE employee, filed a lawsuit in January 2024 against Vince McMahon, WWE, and John Laurinaitis. The lawsuit accuses McMahon of sexual assault and sex trafficking. McMahon resigned from TKO/WWE following the lawsuit being filed. Laurinaitis has since been dropped from the lawsuit

Fightful.com
 
Last edited:

Blazehausen

Minion #420
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
243,781
Reaction score
89,075
Points
128
Age
34
Location
Crawford County, GA
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
MOLAnG4
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
homd3TG
Favorite Sports Team
gLxCq87
Favorite Sports Team
WrE8t1L
Favorite Sports Team
lurU13l
Favorite Sports Team
HHst8yg
Plenty of cases go on for awhile. Honestly not all that shocking if you ask me
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tg11

Crocker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
994
Points
113
Location
Manchester, England

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
414,644
Reaction score
174,353
Points
128
Age
30
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
414,644
Reaction score
174,353
Points
128
Age
30
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers

Sworn deposition testimony from WWE President Nick Khan states that the Department of Justice’s criminal investigation involving Vince McMahon included possible violations of sex trafficking statutes. Although no charges related to the investigation were filed against McMahon, Khan’s statements under oath undermine his former boss’s January 2025 claim, asserting that the federal inquiry was nothing more than a matter of “minor accounting errors.”

Khan’s testimony was taken in December 2025 as part of the ongoing shareholder merger lawsuit against former WWE board members in the Delaware Chancery Court.

McMahon negotiated several NDAs in which he agreed to pay millions to women who formerly worked for WWE across many years and who accused him of sexual misconduct. McMahon signed at least some of those agreements on behalf of both himself and the company. After the scandal made headlines in 2022, WWE had to correct its financial reporting filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to account for the payments that also provided protections for the company.

In January 2025, following a settlement with the SEC, in which he was ordered to pay a $400,000 penalty and repay WWE $1.3 million, McMahon issued a statement that read:

“Today ends nearly three years of investigation by different governmental agencies. There has been a great deal of speculation about what exactly the government was investigating and what the outcome would be. As today’s resolution shows, much of that speculation was misguided and misleading.”

McMahon added: “In the end, there was never anything more to this than minor accounting errors with regard to some personal payments that I made several years ago while I was CEO of WWE. I’m thrilled that I can now put all this behind me.”

Khan’s testimony stands in contrast to that statement.

What Nick Khan testified to

An attorney for the shareholder plaintiffs asked Khan when he became aware that the DOJ was looking into matters beyond accounting issues.

“When the search warrants for the devices were served upon Vince, Brad Blum, and Vince’s personal assistant and when those warrants were sent from Vince’s lawyers to WWE’s lawyers, and they were read to me and it included sex trafficking is when I was aware of it,” Khan responded while under oath in a Los Angeles law office last December.

nes? 2 MS. MURPHY: Object to form. And also, you 3 know, objection to the extent it calls for anything 4 you learned in this time period from your attorneys. 5 BY MR. TIMLIN: 6 Q Yeah, I'm not asking about what advice you 7 were getting. I'm asking about what you knew from 8 DOJ's actions that you were observing. 9 MS. MURPHY: But I also think it's important 10 that you clarify what time period you're talking 11 about because I know what you're trying to do right 12 now and -- 13 BY MR. TIMLIN: 14 Q Well, I'm trying to get a sense of when did 15 you come to understand that what DOJ was looking at 16 was not merely a securities and accounting issue? 17 A When the search warrants for the devices 18 were served upon Vince, Brad Blum, and Vince's 19 personal assistant and when those warrants were sent 20 from Vince's lawyers to WWE's lawyers, and they were 21 read to me and it included sex trafficking is when I 22 was aware of it. 23 Q Okay. Is the assistant that you're 24 referring to

Above: A portion of Nick Khan’s deposition transcript, filed publicly in the WWE merger shareholder lawsuit. “A” precedes testimony from Khan. Highlights added by POST Wrestling.​

A search warrant in this context is a court order allowing law enforcement to seize specific items. One was executed on McMahon on July 17, 2023, according to a WWE securities disclosure filed soon after. Federal authorities had possession of a phone belonging to McMahon until last year, according to court filings in the merger suit, in which the plaintiffs allege McMahon preselected Endeavor as his deal partner in the sale process that led to the creation of TKO. Khan and others who were WWE board members at the time are co-defendants along with McMahon, all of whom deny the suit’s key allegations.

Former employee Janel Grant sued McMahon and WWE in an ongoing civil case, submitted in January 2024, alleging she was sexually assaulted by McMahon as well as sex trafficked to former executive John Laurinaitis. She claims that at McMahon’s behest, she sent sexually explicit images to Brock Lesnar amid his WWE talent contract negotiation. McMahon has denied Grant’s allegations.

Khan affirmed in multiple instances across his day-long deposition that he was aware sex trafficking was among the statutes the government was examining.

The deposition was among materials made public last month after this reporter initiated a process to challenge the confidential treatment of certain materials in the case, under a court rule that allows any person to do so.

Khan also confirmed that DOJ prosecutors asked him about “sex crimes” during his own government interview, in addition to questions about the recording of payments.

In the deposition related to the TKO merger, the plaintiff attorney, Edward Timlin, asked Khan whether a grand jury subpoena — received by WWE sometime after Sept. 2, 2022, before the later warrants — also referenced sex trafficking. Khan initially said he didn’t recall, but after Timlin described the subpoena as containing sex trafficking statutes, Khan said: “In hearing you say it, I do recall when I read the grand jury subpoena that it said something about trafficking in there.”






Above: Portions of Nick Khan’s deposition transcript, filed publicly in the WWE merger shareholder lawsuit. “A” precedes testimony from Khan. Highlights added by POST Wrestling.​

A grand jury subpoena is a demand for evidence to help those jurors decide if a person should be charged with a crime. Grand jury proceedings are confidential. Because McMahon was never indicted, most details about the investigation have never been made public, though the Wall Street Journal reported in February 2024 that McMahon was being investigated for sex trafficking and sexual assault allegations.

Earlier in his deposition in the merger case, Timlin showed Khan a document and told him that the grand jury subpoena contained “both security statutes and sex trafficking statutes.” Khan confirmed he subsequently learned that sex trafficking statutes were among the violations under investigation.

“I certainly did learn that that was the case,” Khan said, according to the transcript.

24 Q Yeah, I don't know. But I'll tell you what 25 I do know. What I do know is that the later grand Page 167 1 jury subpoena has both security statutes and sex 2 trafficking statutes in it. 3 What I want to know is if you know whether 4 this other division of the office related to 5 something other than the sort of securities and 6 accounting angle of the alleged wrongdoing? 7 A I do not know. I did not know at the point 8 of this correspondence. I subsequently learned what 9 you just articulated. 10 Q Okay. That there was an investigation of 11 sex trafficking statutes? 12 A Yes. 13 Q Okay. So sitting here today, you don't know 14 whether or not this different division that's 15 referenced here was something related to major 16 crimes or -- 17 A I do not. 18 Q -- similar? 19 Okay. 20 Do you happen to know when you learned that 21 the violations of sex trafficking statutes were also 22 under investigation? 23 MR. HANLEY: Object to form. 24 THE WITNESS: Not specifically, no, b

Above: A portion of Nick Khan’s deposition transcript, filed publicly in the WWE merger shareholder lawsuit. “A” and “THE WITNESS” precede testimony from Khan. Highlights added by POST Wrestling.​

McMahon’s representatives said in early 2025 that the investigation had concluded without any charges. The former WWE CEO and Chairman has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct made against him.

Khan: Warrants were sent from Vince’s lawyers to WWE’s lawyers

One part of Khan’s testimony speaks to McMahon’s legal team’s awareness of the subject matter of the DOJ inquiry.

Khan testified that search warrants, which indicated sex trafficking was under consideration, were “sent from Vince’s lawyers to WWE’s lawyers.” If accurate, that means McMahon’s own attorneys, from white-shoe law firm Kirkland & Ellis, had that documentation from the government — years before McMahon’s January 2025 statement characterizing the entire matter as involving only accounting concerns.

This week, POST Wrestling sent a detailed inquiry to McMahon’s current public relations representatives, presenting them with Khan’s testimony. We asked specifically if it was McMahon’s position that he was never investigated for sex trafficking or other sexual misconduct allegations. We did not receive a response or any other comments from them for this story despite multiple attempts to reach the representatives.

In June 2024, federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) — the office that was investigating McMahon’s conduct — intervened in Grant’s civil suit, asking for a six-month stay of the case, a step commonly taken to prevent evidence requests in a civil lawsuit from interfering with a simultaneous criminal investigation.

Soon after the request for the stay, in June 2024, POST Wrestling received the following characterization from a source close to the situation, which we did not publish:

“The federal investigation that prompted the government to seek a six-month stay in the civil lawsuit brought by Ms. Grant against Vince McMahon is focused exclusively on disclosure and accounting issues at WWE surrounding NDAs,” the source told us. “There is no mention of sex-trafficking in any of the government’s papers filed with the court.”

The “government’s papers filed with the court” referred specifically to filings submitted by SDNY related to the stay request in the Grant case, including two sealed documents. The search warrants and subpoenas discussed earlier in this article aren’t necessarily filed with any court, and it’s possible that whatever SDNY attorneys filed into the Grant case, along with their stay request, did not describe the full scope of the investigation.

We did not publish the 2024 characterization from the source because we had concerns that the comment would mislead readers about whether sex trafficking was being investigated at all. We communicated those concerns at the time and asked the source directly to reconcile or dispute the Wall Street Journal’s February 2024 report that allegations of sex trafficking and sexual assault against McMahon were being investigated by federal authorities. Those questions weren’t answered. We followed up with that source again this week, but we were not provided with an explanation.

Later, in February 2025, after a Second Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a ruling in a sealed matter from SDNY that a person familiar with the case confirmed involved McMahon, one of his attorneys, Robert W. Allen of Kirkland & Ellis, provided a statement asserting the investigation “has definitively concluded and will not result in charges.” Allen’s statement addressed the DOJ inquiry’s outcome but not its subject matter.

Janel Grant’s messages from the FBI

Separately from Khan’s testimony, Grant recently posted to Instagram an image of what appears to be a letter addressed to her from the FBI’s Victim Notification System, dated May 23, 2023, identifying her as a “possible victim of a crime” in an active federal investigation being conducted by the FBI’s New York office. The text accompanying Grant’s post states she received multiple similar letters between May 2023 and December 2025. POST Wrestling sent an email to the FBI New York requesting that the press office verify the authenticity of the letter that appears in Grant’s post. The office did not respond.

We did confirm that Grant’s Instagram account, which was created in recent weeks and is her first known presence on social media, is legitimately controlled by her, according to a person familiar with that matter.

On Thursday, Grant posted a screenshot of what appears to be part of another message addressed to her from FBI New York addressed to her: an email dated May 30, 2025.

The FBI’s Victim Notification System was created by the government to fulfill a legal mandate to notify possible victims of crimes of developments in related investigations. Grant’s public allegations against McMahon relate primarily to sexual misconduct. If the letter is authentic, it’s consistent with the FBI notifying Grant of her status as a possible victim of a sexual misconduct inquiry. It does not establish that any charges were filed, and McMahon was not indicted for any crime related to the investigation involving him, which spanned from approximately 2022 to 2025.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob Fox

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
414,644
Reaction score
174,353
Points
128
Age
30
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers

Vince McMahon and other WWE senior leaders defended Wednesday their use of the Signal platform with its disappearing messages amid UFC merger negotiations challenged by investors.

There’s no gap in communications to probe, their attorneys told the Delaware Chancery Court.

The World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. co-founder “is a prolific texter,” and 22,000 messages across multiple platforms have been produced to investors, said one of McMahon’s lawyers, Haley Stern of Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

McMahon’s attorneys preserved data from his personal devices, even after they were seized by federal authorities investigating sexual misconduct allegations against him, she said. But Signal data sought by the investors wasn’t available for retrieval until after those devices were returned in October 2025.

The investors argue messages apparently missing from chats on Signal, an encrypted platform that can be set to have content disappear, could’ve been relevant to the litigation.

“We don’t have to show intentionality to show adverse inferences,” said one of their attorneys, Anthony Calvano of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP. “Recklessness is sufficient.”

Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster adjourned the hearing without ruling on the investors’ motion.

The investors speculate that McMahon and WWE’s directors and officers reserved their most candid conversations for Signal, but in fact they spoke openly about the deal in group chats, texts, and voice memos, said Eric Leon of Latham & Watkins LLP, representing the WWE’s other senior leaders.

“These parties negotiated this deal really the old fashioned way,” he said. “They did it with dinners and lunches, and they did it over the phone, and we produced all of the phone records.”

Investors have challenged the fairness of WWE’s $21.4 billion merger with mixed martial arts giant Ultimate Fighting Championship. The lawsuit alleged McMahon manipulated the deal to secure control of the company and rejected higher offers in favor of a deal with a longtime friend, Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel.

The 2023 merger followed McMahon’s return to the WWE in the wake of allegations that he sexually harassed and abused female subordinates for decades. Shareholders agreed to drop a separate lawsuit after McMahon agreed to repay $17.4 million that the WWE spent investigating those claims. McMahon resigned as executive chairman of TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC and WWE, in January 2024, after another sexual misconduct allegation was made against him.

Laster sanctioned former Facebook director Sheryl Sandberg in January 2025 for intentionally deleting emails related to the Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal, a decision that would have made it harder for her to defend herself at trial. Meta Platforms Inc. settled the lawsuit against Sandberg, Mark Zuckerberg, and other senior leaders for $190 million.

The case is In re World Wrestling Ent. Inc. Merger Litig., Del. Ch., No. 2023-1166, hearing 5/13/26.
 

Barry Poppins

Social Progressive
Joined
Mar 7, 2019
Messages
104,030
Reaction score
35,479
Points
138
Age
29


Vince McMahon, Ari Emanuel, Nick Khan, and Paul Levesque will be testifying.

Brandon Thurston of POST Wrestling and Wrestlenomics has an update on the WWE merger trial. Vince McMahon, Ari Emanuel, Nick Khan, and Paul ‘Triple H’ Levesque are set to testify.


Those four names involved with the TKO merger are only a few of the witnesses who’ll be testifying in the shareholder lawsuit trial. The trial begins on June 8th in the Delaware Court of Chancery. A pre-trial order was submitted, which included the aforementioned names.

The lawsuit alleges that former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon set up the TKO deal to make sure his standing in WWE was kept firm. This came after the sexual misconduct allegations against McMahon arose in the summer of 2022. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are claiming that McMahon went with Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel as the buyer because of their pre-existing relationship and the security of Emanuel keeping McMahon on board post-merger. The plaintiffs feel that other bidders did not have a fair shot at attempting to acquire WWE.

Plaintiffs and defendants plan to call on McMahon and Emanuel as live witnesses in the courtroom. Also on the plaintiffs’ list is Nick Khan, TKO executive Mark Shapiro, and Raine banker Jeff Sine, who advised WWE on the merger deal.

Vince McMahon has separate legal counsel from his fellow defendants, Nick Khan, Paul Levesque, and former WWE Board members George Barrios and Michelle Wilson.

Below is the list of names who are intended to be called live/could be called on in court:

Plaintiffs intend to call live:​

  • Vince McMahon, then-WWE/TKO Executive Chairman
  • Ari Emanuel, TKO CEO & Chairman, and then-Endeavor CEO
  • Mark Shapiro, TKO President & COO, Endeavor President
  • Jeffrey Sine, Raine banker
  • Frank Riddick, then-WWE Chief Financial Officer and board member
  • Andrew Schleimer, TKO CFO and then-UFC CFO
  • Brendan Houlihan, expert witness
  • James Canessa, expert witness

Plaintiffs may call live or by deposition:​

  • Jeffrey Speed, then-WWE board member
  • Stephanie McMahon, then-WWE executive and board member
  • Marty Patterson, Liberty Media President & CEO
  • Steve Pamon, then-WWE board member

Defendants intend to call live (several witnesses also appear on the plaintiffs’ list):​

  • George Barrios, then-WWE board member and former WWE executive
  • Brad Blum, former WWE executive
  • Ari Emanuel
  • Daniel Lee, Moelis Managing Director (an advisor in the process)
  • Paul Finger, JP Morgan Managing Director (advisor)
  • Nick Khan, WWE President and then-board member
  • Steve Koonin, TKO board member, then-WWE board member
  • Paul Levesque, WWE Chief Content Officer, then-WWE board member and executive
  • Vince McMahon
  • Frank Riddick
  • Andrew Schleimer
  • Mark Shapiro
  • Jeffrey Sine
  • Michelle Wilson, then-WWE board member and former WWE executive
  • Mark Zhu, TKO Chief Strategy Officer and then-Endeavor executive
  • Doug Perlman, expert witness
  • Professor Steven Salaga, expert witness
  • Professor David C. Smith, expert witness
  • Matthew Archer, shareholder plaintiff
  • Dennis Palkon, shareholder plaintiff
Cases in the Delaware Court of Chancery are decided by the judge as opposed to the jury. Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster will be presiding over the case.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Blazehausen

Brett

Paranoid Android
Joined
Aug 8, 2025
Messages
6,920
Reaction score
2,072
Points
113
Age
27
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
briscoebros
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
scotthall
Favorite Wrestler
FOxu9qI
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
Corporate Law is so confusing man. I can't fully understand as to what is illegal about being the principal owner of something and then selling it to someone you trust moreso than another party. Wouldn't this imply that any company sold should just be put up for auction and the highest bidder wins ? Otherwise, what other reasons besides personal would you have to not just sell to the highest bidder.

This also isn't a McMahon apologist post. It's just so ironic to me that thing he is going on trial for is an arbitrary fucking money scheme bull shit vs. him sexually assaulting and abusing women.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
414,644
Reaction score
174,353
Points
128
Age
30
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
I think the gimmick here is bc it's a public company, you can't just sell via your own opinions, you have to make the best decision for the shareholders. It's probably hard to prove someone didn't but that's what's being alleged here by them
 

Brett

Paranoid Android
Joined
Aug 8, 2025
Messages
6,920
Reaction score
2,072
Points
113
Age
27
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
briscoebros
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
scotthall
Favorite Wrestler
FOxu9qI
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
I think the gimmick here is bc it's a public company, you can't just sell via your own opinions, you have to make the best decision for the shareholders. It's probably hard to prove someone didn't but that's what's being alleged here by them
I'd fancy an opinion that assaulting women puts the shareholders in the most jeopardy (not pointed at you my dog)